🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to release them publicly.

Possible Impetus for AI Training

Observers noted the apparent leak could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for data to develop their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and record names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the leak did not represent its entire catalog.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party collected public metadata and used illicit tactics to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Declared Goal and Worries

The streaming service does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, said the leaked music would likely be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated data is sadly widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used training AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to a large online archive, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “build their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive added it could also enable tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a battleground between artists, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Proposals and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for science, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.